Login Register

Anyone tried an M56LK 3.57:1 on an LPT 850?

Post Reply
User avatar
kcodyjr
Posts: 1236
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 23:48
Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T AWD
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post by kcodyjr »

Seems like the excess low-end torque would be a good match for the tall ratios.

What cars can they be gotten from? Am I likely to find one in North America?

Could I possibly source this transmission and then marry it to "everything else" from a local donor car?

This is highly speculative; much as I'd like to turn it into a stick, the automatic is working fine albeit sometimes shifting roughly under partial load. Unlikely I'll ever be rich enough to ship an entire donor car from overseas.
2012 C70 T5 Platinum, ember black on cranberry leather
2006 S60 2.5T AWD, ice white on oak textile
5 others that came and went

User avatar
kcodyjr
Posts: 1236
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 23:48
Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T AWD
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post by kcodyjr »

Apparently it's not the LK, it's the M56L2, and can be found, presumably among other places, on a 1999 V70 2.5 TDI. I assume that's US model year 2000.
M56L2-P9482019.jpg
M56L2-P9482019.jpg (20.92 KiB) Viewed 1152 times
Figures there'd be contradictory information in the listings of what transmissions exist with what ratios.

Still my calculator got 10.96:1 if that L2 has the 3.07 1st, or 12.07:1 if it's the 3.38, both of which are shorter than the shortest AW50-42 1st at 9.95:1. So, shouldn't it produce better acceleration off the line than the slushbox, even though it's an overly long ratio manual meant for a diesel?

As for actually doing it, I've read that I'll have to swap those internals over to an M56 casing meant for a gasoline engine, can anyone confirm or refute?
2012 C70 T5 Platinum, ember black on cranberry leather
2006 S60 2.5T AWD, ice white on oak textile
5 others that came and went

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post