Login Register

2005 XC70 harsh shifting

Post Reply
User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11911
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 14:03
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 311 times
Been thanked: 817 times

Post by erikv11 »

There is a car on CL nearby, 05 XC70 with 135k. The ad says:
"Tranmission is shifting erratic and harsh. When the car is cold it works perfect. After 5 miles or so it's starts acting up. Not drivable long distances. I'm trying to buy a bigger car so I don't want to mess with it.
- update. Got transmission flushed and it is shifting better..."

Before I call them and maybe look at it, would appreciate any opinions on this, are there known trans issues on an 05?

It's priced to sell but still, the car will have to be really nice to lure me in, in general I am not very interested in AWD. Don't need it here, and it just adds weight and bulk. And inaccessible fuel pumps. I have been driving P80 cars since forever, any other tips on P2 are welcome.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013, 06:20
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

I don't buy the 'shifts better now' thing. The owner got the car with issues and now it's getting rid of it. The AWD is also problematic for that year.

I'd look rather for a 2005+ S60 or V70 with the 2.4t or 2.5t engine. Even the 2.4 non turbo is decent and gets better mpg.

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 36140
Joined: 17 Feb 2013, 17:54
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 4064 times

Post by abscate »

If it's nice in and out, you can swap a trans pretty cheap, worst case.

The P2s will suck you in, though.its a really nice upscale ride from a P80.
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

stoutlogic
Posts: 182
Joined: 03 Jan 2006, 19:22
Year and Model: 2006 XC70
Location: NJ
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by stoutlogic »

This sounds like my car! It isn't actually my car but I'm having the same issues. 2006 xc70 140k on the clock. I got it from a friend on the cheap knowing it had issues. Interior and exterior in great shape for the age. Previous owner had it dealer serviced up until the trans started giving her issues. She took it to a indy Volvo shop and was told needs a new tranny, just drive it till it dies. She was just going to trade it in but i took a chance and bought it. I'm now trying to figure out if it can be fixed with a valve body and new solenoids, new tranny or sell the car?

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11911
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 14:03
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 311 times
Been thanked: 817 times

Post by erikv11 »

Hmmmmmm. I'm not seeing good reasons to get into an 05 AWD with a troublesome trans. Will keep my eyes open for that 07 T5. Thanks all for the replies.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 201k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 223k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

vtl
Posts: 4926
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 13:35
Year and Model: 2005 XC70
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 686 times

Post by vtl »

oragex wrote: 30 Mar 2017, 03:44The AWD is also problematic for that year.

What is problematic specifically for that year?
oragex wrote: 30 Mar 2017, 03:44Even the 2.4 non turbo is decent and gets better mpg.
2.4 N/A is a lazy dog compared to 2.5T AWD :)
Last edited by vtl on 31 Mar 2017, 06:38, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
oragex
Posts: 5347
Joined: 24 May 2013, 06:20
Year and Model: S60 2003
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 352 times
Contact:

Post by oragex »

I think the n/a pulls decently being a 5 cylinder. Even at highway speeds, it still has some torque remaining. Where the 2.4 n/a lacks presence is with 3-4 adults in the car. No doubt, once you get the low pressure turbo one you won't go back to the n/a. And the high pressure T5 is just another car once it rolls 8)

JRL
Posts: 9350
Joined: 22 Nov 2005, 14:07
Year and Model: Several
Location: 19333
Been thanked: 16 times

Post by JRL »

Unless the fluid is burned a new or rebuilt valvebody should fix this
Mod note. Jim passed away in early 2022, his contributions to this forum are immortal, and he is missed. RIP

2000 V70R Black, 144,000 miles Wife's R.
2007 V70 2.5T White/Oak 111,000 MILES. Polestar tune, IPD bars, rear spoiler, dark grey Thors, DWS 06, HU850, sub.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post