Login Register

99 V70XC P0134 Code with Sputters

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
JeffHicks
Posts: 270
Joined: 22 October 2013
Year and Model: 1989 240 Wagon,
Location: United States
Been thanked: 1 time

99 V70XC P0134 Code with Sputters

Post by JeffHicks »

Hey Guys - the other day my buddy brought over his 99XC. Problem was that the exhaust pipe broke right at the back of the cat converter. Because neither of us know a guy with a welder, and he doesn't want to "go the whole route" with all new exhaust, we "fixed" it by inserting a 2-1/8th "tube" inside the pipe, and sliding the pieces back together.

About half hour later, his CEL light came on, and he was throwing the P0134 code - for a bad O2 Sensor. He said it also would run sluggish when he really laid into the accelerator.

Is it possible that that little "tube" created enough back pressure to throw that code? Did we jimmy the sensor somehow? Is it possible that this is just completely random and coincidental?
1989 240 Wagon, 1999 V70 Base, 2002 XC70, 2005 V70 T5

Ozark Lee
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14798
Joined: 7 September 2006
Year and Model: Many Volvos
Location: USA Midwest
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by Ozark Lee »

How far into the catalytic converter did the pipe go? On a '99 XC the rear oxygen sensor is actually screwed into the catalytic converter and I suppose if the pipe went in far enough it could have blocked the flow around the sensor. I'm not sure how things flow through that style of converter since I've, thankfully, never had to replace one and had a chance to look at it close up out of the car.

That still shouldn't change the performance just due to the sensor error. All the rear sensor does is monitor the efficiency of the converter - a tattletale of sorts.

...Lee
'94 850 N/A 5 speed
'96 Platinum Edition Turbo
Previous:
1999 V70XC - Nautic Blue - Totaled while parked.
1999 V70XC - RIP - Wrecked Parts Car.
1998 S70 T5
1996 850 N/A
1989 740 GLT
1986 740 GLT
1972 142 Grand Luxe

JeffHicks
Posts: 270
Joined: 22 October 2013
Year and Model: 1989 240 Wagon,
Location: United States
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by JeffHicks »

Ozark Lee wrote:How far into the catalytic converter did the pipe go? On a '99 XC the rear oxygen sensor is actually screwed into the catalytic converter and I suppose if the pipe went in far enough it could have blocked the flow around the sensor. I'm not sure how things flow through that style of converter since I've, thankfully, never had to replace one and had a chance to look at it close up out of the car.

That still shouldn't change the performance just due to the sensor error. All the rear sensor does is monitor the efficiency of the converter - a tattletale of sorts.

...Lee
Thanks for the reply!

The pipe is only pushed (maybe) half-inch into the cat converter. I don't think there's any way the pipe itself could have hit the sensor.

This car is a turbo model, which makes me wonder about the remote possibility that that tiny little bit of "interference" in the exhaust system could set off the code.

I know these cars are apt to need the upstream sensor replaced, but the timing of this just seems very very odd.
1989 240 Wagon, 1999 V70 Base, 2002 XC70, 2005 V70 T5

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post