Login Register

New MAF, black smoke and stalling.

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Re: New MAF, black smoke and stalling.

Post by misha »

The sign that the car runs better without it than with it connected points to a bad MAF.
It could be that connector needs to be zip-tied.It's common failure on this cars.
Other than that,you have a huge vacuum leak somewhere or your new MAF is bad right out the box.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
rspi
Posts: 7303
Joined: 5 November 2011
Year and Model: 850 T-5R Wagon
Location: Cincinnati OH
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Contact:

Post by rspi »

My guess would be that there is a hole in the turbo pressure system, between the turbo and intake.
'95 855 T-5R M, Panther - 22/28 mpg, 546,000 miles
'95 955 T-5R Yellow Wagon, Lemonade, 180,000 miles
--------------------
Volvo's of past: '87 740 GLE, '79 262C Bertone, '78 264, 960's, '98 S70 GLT, '95 850 T-5R YellowVolvo Repair Videos

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

abscate wrote: ... Thats a turbo car, right? If there is the slightest leak in the induction hoses, after MAF but before throttle body, it won't run well with the MAF connected.
This. Check the intercooler hoses for small splits, and for loose clamps.

Everyone is saying the same things: bad Bosch MAF (unlucky - get one from the junkyard to test) or intake leak.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

Moppman
Posts: 15
Joined: 16 February 2017
Year and Model: 98 S70 GLT
Location: Ohio

Post by Moppman »

Alright, everyone is saying vacuum leak so I'll start checking on those. From the top there seems to be no leak, split or disconnection but I haven't checked from the bottom so I'll check that today.

Moppman
Posts: 15
Joined: 16 February 2017
Year and Model: 98 S70 GLT
Location: Ohio

Post by Moppman »

misha wrote:The sign that the car runs better without it than with it connected points to a bad MAF.
It could be that connector needs to be zip-tied.It's common failure on this cars.
Other than that,you have a huge vacuum leak somewhere or your new MAF is bad right out the box.
I replaced it with an OEM Bosch MAF so that's been ruled out. I'm checking today for vacuum leaks, non from the top but could be on the bottom.

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

Did you try zip-tying it's connector:
MAFtr.jpg
MAFtr.jpg (30.6 KiB) Viewed 998 times
You have few possibilities here:
-bad maf right out of the box(less likely)
-huge vacuum leak somewhere(more likely)
-bad maf sensor's connector(common fault on these cars)

Since you have been driving the car for some time with bad Maf,your o2 sensors are fouled with soot and not able to work properly.There is possibility that Cat is also clogged.
Last edited by misha on 18 Feb 2017, 11:20, edited 1 time in total.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

User avatar
rspi
Posts: 7303
Joined: 5 November 2011
Year and Model: 850 T-5R Wagon
Location: Cincinnati OH
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Contact:

Post by rspi »

Also, make sure your intercooler is not cracked or split on the bottom of the car. I purchased a car that had a large chunk missing from the intercooler.

'95 855 T-5R M, Panther - 22/28 mpg, 546,000 miles
'95 955 T-5R Yellow Wagon, Lemonade, 180,000 miles
--------------------
Volvo's of past: '87 740 GLE, '79 262C Bertone, '78 264, 960's, '98 S70 GLT, '95 850 T-5R YellowVolvo Repair Videos

User avatar
RigsPGT
Posts: 165
Joined: 2 January 2014
Year and Model: Red 99 S70 T5,
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by RigsPGT »

I'm afraid you might have bought or sent a MAF from a naturally aspirated car. Do the part numbers match on the new one? Now either you have a bad new MAF or a wrong one due to web site errors. If unplugging it the car works good then we can rule out any other things with the car itself and point the fault to the MAF. I drove more than 100 miles on a bad MAF plugged in without having a CEL being tripped.
99 S70 T5, The Red Devil
Ported 19T and R manifold, 3" DP with Magnaflow race cat, 2.5" cat back, Precision FMIC, Rigs intake pipe, H&Rs, Bilsteins, 302's with Akebonos, Jewels, HIDs, egg crate grille, transmission cooler.

User avatar
misha
Posts: 5379
Joined: 7 December 2008
Year and Model: '97 850 2.5 20v
Location: Serbia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Post by misha »

RigsPgt.....Maf sensors are the SAME for na & turbo cars from '96-'99.....erikv11 allready pointed that out to you.
Bosch # 0 280 217 107.
'99 & '00 have different ones but still the same for na & turbo...and it would be Bosch 0 280 218 108.It's connection is different too.
'97 850 2.5 20v / fully equipped / Motronic 4.4 from the factory / upgraded with S,V,C,XC70 instrument cluster / polar white wagon
History of Volvos in the family:
'71 144 S
'73 144 De Luxe
'78 244 DL
'78 244 DL
'79 244 GLE
'85 340 GLS

Moppman
Posts: 15
Joined: 16 February 2017
Year and Model: 98 S70 GLT
Location: Ohio

Post by Moppman »

RigsPGT wrote:I'm afraid you might have bought or sent a MAF from a naturally aspirated car. Do the part numbers match on the new one? Now either you have a bad new MAF or a wrong one due to web site errors. If unplugging it the car works good then we can rule out any other things with the car itself and point the fault to the MAF. I drove more than 100 miles on a bad MAF plugged in without having a CEL being tripped.
From what I've learned, the MAF is the same for the turbo and normal model. When either MAF is plugged in I get no CEL light, just runs incredibly rich. New MAF at least will hold an idle, with the old MAF it won't idle longer than a few seconds.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post