Login Register

Two Sensors Die at Once? 98 v70 T5

Help, Advice and DIY Tutorials on Volvo's P80 platform cars -- Volvo's 1990s "bread and butter" cars -- powered by the ubiquitous and durable Volvo inline 5-cylinder engine.

1992 - 1997 850, including 850 R, 850 T-5R, 850 T-5, 850 GLT
1997 - 2000 S70, S70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70, V70 AWD
1997 - 2000 V70-XC
1997 - 2004 C70

Post Reply
User avatar
WagonLagan
Posts: 60
Joined: 19 August 2014
Year and Model: 1998 V70 T5
Location: PA, US

Re: Two Sensors Die at Once? 98 V70 T5

Post by WagonLagan »

erikv11 wrote: 12 Jul 2017, 12:14 Unplugging it can set a code, but basically will do nothing else unless you are driving from the high rockies to the Gulf of Mexico in one (fast-moving) day. I've done it before when trying to cure stray baro code - it didn't affect driving at all.
In that case, I'll unplug it and see if that resolves anything. If not, I'll smoke it on Friday.
erikv11 wrote: 12 Jul 2017, 12:12 I think you missed a key point - a 98 V70 runs on motronic (m4.4) not fenix engine management, so check again because likely there is no shared violet wire.
Does ^this^ mean that unplugging the MAP sensor is irrelevent?

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

Yes that is the whole point: the name MAP sensor is misleading and actually not even used here, it is actually a "BAP" sensor (see https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/volvo- ... 0261230018). The sensor on your car measures outside air (Barometric) pressure, not Manifold (the M in MAP) pressure.

However I do not know if there is a shared wire with the TPS, I defer to mrbrian or someone else.
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
abscate
MVS Moderator
Posts: 35284
Joined: 17 February 2013
Year and Model: 99: V70s S70s,05 V70
Location: Port Jefferson Long Island NY
Has thanked: 1502 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Post by abscate »

It's always hard for me to convince myself a little rubber hose can cause all this,
You can search these pages to find a *few* examples of this...

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Empty Nester
A Captain in a Sea of Estrogen
1999-V70-T5M56 2005-V70-M56 1999-S70 VW T4 XC90-in-Red
Link to Maintenance record thread

User avatar
sleddriver
Posts: 975
Joined: 8 April 2010
Year and Model: 1998 V70 T5
Location: Tx
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Post by sleddriver »

WagonLagan wrote: 12 Jul 2017, 11:59
jblackburn wrote: 12 Jul 2017, 11:26 Could be the cable to the fuse box. It's happened before, it might be happening again.
The atmospheric sensor on a 98 is right in front of the fill hole for the windshield washer fluid tank. It does next to nothing on a 98.
Unplug it and leave it unplugged and see if the car acts up.
Wouldn't unplugging it cause the same issues as if it was malfunctioning? I did clean it to no benefit.
In other news: I built a smoker, and am waiting for the caulk to dry to give it a try.
Unfortunately the baro-sensor is a damn expensive part. Mine went Tango Uniform. I ignored the code for a long time before buying a new one. Do your self a favor and go pull one from a junk yard FIRST!

You can't always clean them.
1998 V70 T5 226,808 miles. Original Owner.
M1 10W-30 HM

User avatar
sleddriver
Posts: 975
Joined: 8 April 2010
Year and Model: 1998 V70 T5
Location: Tx
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Post by sleddriver »

It's always hard for me to convince myself a little rubber hose can cause all this
Oh yea it can....

Turbo motors are very, very sensitive to vacuum leaks. Any unmetered air entering the system causes problems. Further, in boost, you lose pressure. Thus any leak is a two-edged sword.

By now, ALL vacuum hoses, elbows, intake vac tree "caps" & gasket, and both B&W check valves should all be replaced. These cars are close to 20yrs old now!!
1998 V70 T5 226,808 miles. Original Owner.
M1 10W-30 HM

User avatar
WagonLagan
Posts: 60
Joined: 19 August 2014
Year and Model: 1998 V70 T5
Location: PA, US

Post by WagonLagan »

Unplugging the MAP:lol: baro sensor didn't help.

I may have found the issue.

About 2 years ago I had replaced the PCV system, and one of the vacuum hoses onto the... okay I don't know what it's called. It's on the vacuum tube tree that is down the tube from the MAF.

Anyway, I jerry-rigged the vacuum hose there because I had limited options, then promptly forgot that I should go back and properly attach it! :roll:

The smoke test (thanks for that suggestion!) led me to it, and I noticed that particular vacuum tube was completely off the tree. Whelp. I'm fixing the tube and reattaching it. We'll see if that fixes it. I suspect it will.

I'll update after a couple days of driving.;;
Last edited by WagonLagan on 14 Jul 2017, 12:54, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
erikv11
Posts: 11800
Joined: 25 July 2009
Year and Model: 850, V70, S60R, XC70
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Post by erikv11 »

It's not a MAP it's a baro sensor! Glad you seem too be tracking it down. :)
'95 854 T-5R, Motronic 4.4, 185k
'98 V70, T5 tune-injectors-turbo, LPT engine, 304k, daily driver
'06 S60 R, 197k
'07 XC70, black, 205k
'07 XC70, willow green, 212k
'99 Camry V6 :shock: 153k
gone: '96 NA 850 210k, '98 NA V70 182k, '98 S70 NA 225k, '96 855 NA 169k

User avatar
WagonLagan
Posts: 60
Joined: 19 August 2014
Year and Model: 1998 V70 T5
Location: PA, US

Post by WagonLagan »

Whelp... That didn't work. If anything it seems to have gotten worse, lol.

https://vid.me/gMiUm

And, interestingly... the CEL comes on, but there's no codes according to my OBDScanner.

During the smoke test, I couldn't see any areas of significant smoke leakage, apart from the one that had fallen off. However, given the fact that it got WORSE after replacing that vacuum hose, I find it unlikely that a damaged vacuum hose is the root cause here.

If it helps anyone diagnose, before this happened, I did have rare, occasional stutter for months, but never, ever this bad. Just an occasional dip, not even once a day. I just chalked it up to 250k miles.

I may have to take this to my Indie... I really don't want to shell out a couple hundred for what might be a simple fix, but I just don't have time to pick the car apart right now. Sigh.

Before I do that, any thoughts on things I could try? Anything that isn't a huge time investment, I'll go for.

My first course of action is to find a replacement Baro sensor. It sounds like that could be causing these issues from what I've read above?

Could electrical issues with the wires to the TPS cause this? If I have to take it to the Indie, I'd at least like to give them a place to start looking.

jblackburn
MVS Moderator
Posts: 14043
Joined: 8 June 2008
Year and Model: 1998 S70 T5
Location: Alexandria, VA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post by jblackburn »

I seriously doubt the baro sensor has ANYTHING to do with it. That's something you pick up just to make the CEL go away once the car's running properly.

It's idling rather like my car did when the MAF was giving off weird readings, though. I kinda doubt the TPS is doing it either. On a 98, it should idle smoothly even with a bad TPS; on the other hand, shift quality will feel like a dump truck.

I think you need a live scanner hooked up to see what sensors are reading what.

As a test (it will throw a code), disconnect the MAF plug with the engine off and see if idle stabilizes.
'98 S70 T5
2016 Chevy Cruze Premier


A learning experience is one of those things that says, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

mercuic: Long live the tractor motor!

User avatar
mrbrian200
Posts: 1554
Joined: 20 January 2016
Year and Model: 2006 S60 2.5T FWD
Location: Northern Indiana/Chicago
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Post by mrbrian200 »

Yes I did miss something big. Because I saw "MAP", assumed it this NA and missed the important "T5" designation in the thread title. I thought Volvo referred to these on the turbo models as an altitude and/or boost pressure sensor (because it's positioned before the throttle plate on the intake it's not measuring MAP)
On '98 motronic the TPS shares a ground circuit with the acceleration sensor, camshaft position sensor, and ambient air temperature sensor. All other wires to these specific sensors are dedicated. Purely conjecture: Some of them may still share a common supply voltage through a voltage regulator inside the ECU with the junction being inside the ECU board traces or a solder joint.

I can't seem to figure out on the diagram which component is the altitude/MAP sensor. The older diagrams leave a lot to be desired (such as a component list that lists everything-named). That list is somewhere else not within the wiring diagram section I'm looking at.

I still think it's a sensor/wiring/ECU problem. He needs to backprobe various circuits while it's acting up and/or examine live data on an OBD tool. My basis being the persistent DTC for the throttle position sensor: it doesn't matter how good or bad it's running, that DTC should not pop up with a known good sensor unless the ECU compares expected MAF air flow to the throttle plate position and it's a malfunction of the MAF throwing the works off. Just for S&G have you tried running it with the MAF disconnected?

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post