I think you miss my point re PM. I only focus on safety items or items that can get me into safety issue or getting stranded.mecheng wrote:...My point is when does all the what if repairs end? It's cheaper, easier to pay $100 /yr for peace of mind roadside assistance and is insanity to replace all what ifs...
IMHO, the decision to replace a part(s) on a preventive basis depends on the following factors:
1. How critical is the car to you/family members? What does "down time" mean?
Loss of income etc.?
If this is a "weekend" car then it does not have to follow a rigorous maintenance schedule.
2. The budget and the desire to DIY.
3. How often do you go out of town for pleasure/business. When you are hundreds of miles from home far away from your tools, parts, it is a diff story.
4. The "consequence" of "living with parts on borrowed time". Most parts have a known MTBF (Mean Time btw failure).
Example:
- Worn/bald tires ---> potential accident, safety issues.
- A radiator with 180K is on borrowed time, it can crack any time. OK if you go around time. Not OK if you leave town frequently.
Not to mention dealing with head gasket issue if radiator blows.
- Cracked brake hose ---> safety issue, replace ASAP.
- Throttle Cable: it may appear sticky etc, but when it breaks, it breaks at either ends where it is crimped into that knob. Alsmot the same failure mode for the hood cable.
5. One's attitude toward car maintenance:
---> as @abscate said PM vs FOF philosophy.
PS: Aviation maintenance follows a different philosophy for obvious reasons: get stranded hundreds of miles in your car is different than plane's engine failure at 33,000 feet.






