I used to own a 59' Ford Fairlane 500 Galaxie which had a 289 in it. Obviously something bad must have happened to the original 292
Dirk
I used to own a 59' Ford Fairlane 500 Galaxie which had a 289 in it. Obviously something bad must have happened to the original 292
All you need is a good old 240 as a base and a conversion kit. Vooila, another FolvoSveedy wrote: ↑17 Mar 2021, 13:41 Yeah they were a great little motor, little being the key word. I always wanted to drop it a MGB I had. Thought that would have been a hoot to drive. But I did have one in a Willys Jeep cj. That was just plain scary. Still have a 289 sitting in a crate. Hmm. 289 Volvo![]()

It may have been mentioned before, but the Newman/Letterman hot-rod builds used the early Ford small block engines, which are narrower than first-gen Chevy. Those were converted from brand new cars though.Sveedy wrote: ↑17 Mar 2021, 13:41 Yeah they were a great little motor, little being the key word. I always wanted to drop it a MGB I had. Thought that would have been a hoot to drive. But I did have one in a Willys Jeep cj. That was just plain scary. Still have a 289 sitting in a crate. Hmm. 289 Volvo![]()
I thought about doing this same thing when my '69 1800S was still among the living. It was a lot of money back then, and the Ford Torino wheels fit, but as I recall the backspacing was off. This same idea has been floated around in the Studebaker world for our 3/4 ton trucks ('49-'54) with two-piece Budd wheels. The few brave souls who have actually commissioned that work refuse to disclose the final contract cost. Must mean it approaches Insane.